Author

Biblio print

Tree Display

AceDB Schema

XML Display

Feedback

Author Report for: Lewis SE

Title: The transposable elements of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin: a genomics perspective
Kaminker JS, Bergman CM, Kronmiller B, Carlson J, Svirskas R, Patel S, Frise E, Wheeler DA, Lewis SE and Celniker SE <2 more author(s)> Kaminker JS, Bergman CM, Kronmiller B, Carlson J, Svirskas R, Patel S, Frise E, Wheeler DA, Lewis SE, Rubin GM, Ashburner M, Celniker SE (- 2)
Ref: Genome Biol, 3:RESEARCH0084, 2002 : PubMed
Abstract


ESTHER: Kaminker_2002_Genome.Biol_3_RESEARCH0084
PubMedSearch: Kaminker 2002 Genome.Biol 3 RESEARCH0084
PubMedID: 12537573
Gene_locus related to this paper: drome-CG8058, drome-CG9542, drome-CG11309, drome-CG11406, drome-CG17097, drome-glita, drome-KRAKEN

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transposable elements are found in the genomes of nearly all eukaryotes. The recent completion of the Release 3 euchromatic genomic sequence of Drosophila melanogaster by the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project has provided precise sequence for the repetitive elements in the Drosophila euchromatin. We have used this genomic sequence to describe the euchromatic transposable elements in the sequenced strain of this species.
RESULTS: We identified 85 known and eight novel families of transposable element varying in copy number from one to 146. A total of 1,572 full and partial transposable elements were identified, comprising 3.86% of the sequence. More than two-thirds of the transposable elements are partial. The density of transposable elements increases an average of 4.7 times in the centromere-proximal regions of each of the major chromosome arms. We found that transposable elements are preferentially found outside genes; only 436 of 1,572 transposable elements are contained within the 61.4 Mb of sequence that is annotated as being transcribed. A large proportion of transposable elements is found nested within other elements of the same or different classes. Lastly, an analysis of structural variation from different families reveals distinct patterns of deletion for elements belonging to different classes.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis represents an initial characterization of the transposable elements in the Release 3 euchromatic genomic sequence of D. melanogaster for which comparison to the transposable elements of other organisms can begin to be made. These data have been made available on the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project website for future analyses.



        

Title: Annotation of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome: a systematic review
Misra S, Crosby MA, Mungall CJ, Matthews BB, Campbell KS, Hradecky P, Huang Y, Kaminker JS, Millburn GH and Lewis SE <20 more author(s)> Misra S, Crosby MA, Mungall CJ, Matthews BB, Campbell KS, Hradecky P, Huang Y, Kaminker JS, Millburn GH, Prochnik SE, Smith CD, Tupy JL, Whitfied EJ, Bayraktaroglu L, Berman BP, Bettencourt BR, Celniker SE, de Grey AD, Drysdale RA, Harris NL, Richter J, Russo S, Schroeder AJ, Shu SQ, Stapleton M, Yamada C, Ashburner M, Gelbart WM, Rubin GM, Lewis SE (- 20)
Ref: Genome Biol, 3:RESEARCH0083, 2002 : PubMed
Abstract


ESTHER: Misra_2002_Genome.Biol_3_RESEARCH0083
PubMedSearch: Misra 2002 Genome.Biol 3 RESEARCH0083
PubMedID: 12537572
Gene_locus related to this paper: drome-a1z6g9, drome-abhd2, drome-ACHE, drome-CG8058, drome-CG8093, drome-CG8233, drome-CG8425, drome-CG9059, drome-CG9186, drome-CG9542, drome-CG10982, drome-CG11309, drome-CG11406, drome-CG11598, drome-CG17097, drome-glita, drome-KRAKEN, drome-nrtac, drome-OME, drome-q7k274, drome-q9vux3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recent completion of the Drosophila melanogaster genomic sequence to high quality and the availability of a greatly expanded set of Drosophila cDNA sequences, aligning to 78% of the predicted euchromatic genes, afforded FlyBase the opportunity to significantly improve genomic annotations. We made the annotation process more rigorous by inspecting each gene visually, utilizing a comprehensive set of curation rules, requiring traceable evidence for each gene model, and comparing each predicted peptide to SWISS-PROT and TrEMBL sequences.
RESULTS: Although the number of predicted protein-coding genes in Drosophila remains essentially unchanged, the revised annotation significantly improves gene models, resulting in structural changes to 85% of the transcripts and 45% of the predicted proteins. We annotated transposable elements and non-protein-coding RNAs as new features, and extended the annotation of untranslated (UTR) sequences and alternative transcripts to include more than 70% and 20% of genes, respectively. Finally, cDNA sequence provided evidence for dicistronic transcripts, neighboring genes with overlapping UTRs on the same DNA sequence strand, alternatively spliced genes that encode distinct, non-overlapping peptides, and numerous nested genes.
CONCLUSIONS: Identification of so many unusual gene models not only suggests that some mechanisms for gene regulation are more prevalent than previously believed, but also underscores the complex challenges of eukaryotic gene prediction. At present, experimental data and human curation remain essential to generate high-quality genome annotations.



        

Title: The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster
Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, Evans CA, Gocayne JD, Amanatides PG, Scherer SE, Li PW, Hoskins RA and Venter JC <185 more author(s)> Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, Evans CA, Gocayne JD, Amanatides PG, Scherer SE, Li PW, Hoskins RA, Galle RF, George RA, Lewis SE, Richards S, Ashburner M, Henderson SN, Sutton GG, Wortman JR, Yandell MD, Zhang Q, Chen LX, Brandon RC, Rogers YH, Blazej RG, Champe M, Pfeiffer BD, Wan KH, Doyle C, Baxter EG, Helt G, Nelson CR, Gabor GL, Abril JF, Agbayani A, An HJ, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Baldwin D, Ballew RM, Basu A, Baxendale J, Bayraktaroglu L, Beasley EM, Beeson KY, Benos PV, Berman BP, Bhandari D, Bolshakov S, Borkova D, Botchan MR, Bouck J, Brokstein P, Brottier P, Burtis KC, Busam DA, Butler H, Cadieu E, Center A, Chandra I, Cherry JM, Cawley S, Dahlke C, Davenport LB, Davies P, de Pablos B, Delcher A, Deng Z, Mays AD, Dew I, Dietz SM, Dodson K, Doup LE, Downes M, Dugan-Rocha S, Dunkov BC, Dunn P, Durbin KJ, Evangelista CC, Ferraz C, Ferriera S, Fleischmann W, Fosler C, Gabrielian AE, Garg NS, Gelbart WM, Glasser K, Glodek A, Gong F, Gorrell JH, Gu Z, Guan P, Harris M, Harris NL, Harvey D, Heiman TJ, Hernandez JR, Houck J, Hostin D, Houston KA, Howland TJ, Wei MH, Ibegwam C, Jalali M, Kalush F, Karpen GH, Ke Z, Kennison JA, Ketchum KA, Kimmel BE, Kodira CD, Kraft C, Kravitz S, Kulp D, Lai Z, Lasko P, Lei Y, Levitsky AA, Li J, Li Z, Liang Y, Lin X, Liu X, Mattei B, McIntosh TC, McLeod MP, McPherson D, Merkulov G, Milshina NV, Mobarry C, Morris J, Moshrefi A, Mount SM, Moy M, Murphy B, Murphy L, Muzny DM, Nelson DL, Nelson DR, Nelson KA, Nixon K, Nusskern DR, Pacleb JM, Palazzolo M, Pittman GS, Pan S, Pollard J, Puri V, Reese MG, Reinert K, Remington K, Saunders RD, Scheeler F, Shen H, Shue BC, Siden-Kiamos I, Simpson M, Skupski MP, Smith T, Spier E, Spradling AC, Stapleton M, Strong R, Sun E, Svirskas R, Tector C, Turner R, Venter E, Wang AH, Wang X, Wang ZY, Wassarman DA, Weinstock GM, Weissenbach J, Williams SM, WoodageT, Worley KC, Wu D, Yang S, Yao QA, Ye J, Yeh RF, Zaveri JS, Zhan M, Zhang G, Zhao Q, Zheng L, Zheng XH, Zhong FN, Zhong W, Zhou X, Zhu S, Zhu X, Smith HO, Gibbs RA, Myers EW, Rubin GM, Venter JC (- 185)
Ref: Science, 287:2185, 2000 : PubMed
Abstract


ESTHER: Adams_2000_Science_287_2185
PubMedSearch: Adams 2000 Science 287 2185
PubMedID: 10731132
Gene_locus related to this paper: drome-1vite, drome-2vite, drome-3vite, drome-a1z6g9, drome-abhd2, drome-ACHE, drome-b6idz4, drome-BEM46, drome-CG5707, drome-CG5704, drome-CG1309, drome-CG1882, drome-CG1986, drome-CG2059, drome-CG2493, drome-CG2528, drome-CG2772, drome-CG3160, drome-CG3344, drome-CG3523, drome-CG3524, drome-CG3734, drome-CG3739, drome-CG3744, drome-CG3841, drome-CG4267, drome-CG4382, drome-CG4390, drome-CG4572, drome-CG4582, drome-CG4851, drome-CG4979, drome-CG5068, drome-CG5162, drome-CG5355, drome-CG5377, drome-CG5397, drome-CG5412, drome-CG5665, drome-CG5932, drome-CG5966, drome-CG6018, drome-CG6113, drome-CG6271, drome-CG6283, drome-CG6295, drome-CG6296, drome-CG6414, drome-CG6431, drome-CG6472, drome-CG6567, drome-CG6675, drome-CG6753, drome-CG6847, drome-CG7329, drome-CG7367, drome-CG7529, drome-CG7632, drome-CG8058, drome-CG8093, drome-CG8233, drome-CG8424, drome-CG8425, drome-CG9059, drome-CG9186, drome-CG9287, drome-CG9289, drome-CG9542, drome-CG9858, drome-CG9953, drome-CG9966, drome-CG10116, drome-CG10163, drome-CG10175, drome-CG10339, drome-CG10357, drome-CG10982, drome-CG11034, drome-CG11055, drome-CG11309, drome-CG11319, drome-CG11406, drome-CG11598, drome-CG11600, drome-CG11608, drome-CG11626, drome-CG11935, drome-CG12108, drome-CG12869, drome-CG13282, drome-CG13562, drome-CG13772, drome-CG14034, drome-nlg3, drome-CG14717, drome-CG15101, drome-CG15102, drome-CG15106, drome-CG15111, drome-CG15820, drome-CG15821, drome-CG15879, drome-CG17097, drome-CG17099, drome-CG17101, drome-CG17191, drome-CG17192, drome-CG17292, drome-CG18258, drome-CG18284, drome-CG18301, drome-CG18302, drome-CG18493, drome-CG18530, drome-CG18641, drome-CG18815, drome-CG31089, drome-CG31091, drome-CG32333, drome-CG32483, drome-CG33174, drome-dnlg1, drome-este4, drome-este6, drome-GH02384, drome-GH02439, drome-glita, drome-KRAKEN, drome-lip1, drome-LIP2, drome-lip3, drome-MESK2, drome-nrtac, drome-OME, drome-q7k274, drome-Q9VJN0, drome-Q8IP31, drome-q9vux3

Abstract

The fly Drosophila melanogaster is one of the most intensively studied organisms in biology and serves as a model system for the investigation of many developmental and cellular processes common to higher eukaryotes, including humans. We have determined the nucleotide sequence of nearly all of the approximately 120-megabase euchromatic portion of the Drosophila genome using a whole-genome shotgun sequencing strategy supported by extensive clone-based sequence and a high-quality bacterial artificial chromosome physical map. Efforts are under way to close the remaining gaps; however, the sequence is of sufficient accuracy and contiguity to be declared substantially complete and to support an initial analysis of genome structure and preliminary gene annotation and interpretation. The genome encodes approximately 13,600 genes, somewhat fewer than the smaller Caenorhabditis elegans genome, but with comparable functional diversity.



        

Title: An exploration of the sequence of a 2.9-Mb region of the genome of Drosophila melanogaster: the Adh region
Ashburner M, Misra S, Roote J, Lewis SE, Blazej R, Davis T, Doyle C, Galle R, George R and Rubin GM <16 more author(s)> Ashburner M, Misra S, Roote J, Lewis SE, Blazej R, Davis T, Doyle C, Galle R, George R, Harris N, Hartzell G, Harvey D, Hong L, Houston K, Hoskins R, Johnson G, Martin C, Moshrefi A, Palazzolo M, Reese MG, Spradling A, Tsang G, Wan K, Whitelaw K, Celniker S, Rubin GM (- 16)
Ref: Genetics, 153:179, 1999 : PubMed
Abstract


ESTHER: Ashburner_1999_Genetics_153_179
PubMedSearch: Ashburner 1999 Genetics 153 179
PubMedID: 10471707

Abstract

A contiguous sequence of nearly 3 Mb from the genome of Drosophila melanogaster has been sequenced from a series of overlapping P1 and BAC clones. This region covers 69 chromosome polytene bands on chromosome arm 2L, including the genetically well-characterized "Adh region." A computational analysis of the sequence predicts 218 protein-coding genes, 11 tRNAs, and 17 transposable element sequences. At least 38 of the protein-coding genes are arranged in clusters of from 2 to 6 closely related genes, suggesting extensive tandem duplication. The gene density is one protein-coding gene every 13 kb; the transposable element density is one element every 171 kb. Of 73 genes in this region identified by genetic analysis, 49 have been located on the sequence; P-element insertions have been mapped to 43 genes. Ninety-five (44%) of the known and predicted genes match a Drosophila EST, and 144 (66%) have clear similarities to proteins in other organisms. Genes known to have mutant phenotypes are more likely to be represented in cDNA libraries, and far more likely to have products similar to proteins of other organisms, than are genes with no known mutant phenotype. Over 650 chromosome aberration breakpoints map to this chromosome region, and their nonrandom distribution on the genetic map reflects variation in gene spacing on the DNA. This is the first large-scale analysis of the genome of D. melanogaster at the sequence level. In addition to the direct results obtained, this analysis has allowed us to develop and test methods that will be needed to interpret the complete sequence of the genome of this species. Before beginning a Hunt, it is wise to ask someone what you are looking for before you begin looking for it. Milne 1926