(Below N is a link to NCBI taxonomic web page and E link to ESTHER at designed phylum.) > cellular organisms: NE > Bacteria: NE > Proteobacteria: NE > Gammaproteobacteria: NE > Pseudomonadales: NE > Pseudomonadaceae: NE > Pseudomonas: NE > Pseudomonas syringae group: NE > Pseudomonas syringae group genomosp. 1: NE > Pseudomonas syringae: NE > Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae: NE
Warning: This entry is a compilation of different species or line or strain with more than 90% amino acid identity. You can retrieve all strain data
(Below N is a link to NCBI taxonomic web page and E link to ESTHER at designed phylum.) Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae HS191: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae UMAF0158: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. lapsa: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae SM: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B64: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. avellanae str. ISPaVe037: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. avellanae str. ISPaVe013: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae PD2766: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae str. B301D-R: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. atrofaciens: N, E.
Pseudomonas congelans: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. aptata str. DSM 50252: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. aptata: N, E.
Pseudomonas sp. ICMP 10191: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi str. 1704B: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae Cit 7: N, E.
Pseudomonas cerasi: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. japonica str. M301072: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. aceris str. M302273: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae CC1557: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. spinaceae: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 18807: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. castaneae: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 9617: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 18804: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae BRIP34881: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19104: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19102: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19101: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 18886: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19103: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae BRIP34876: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 18801: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19071: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19073: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae BRIP39023: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19097: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19100: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19099: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19096: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae str. M302091: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19079: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19068: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. theae ICMP 3923: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19072: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19070: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 18883: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 9855: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19095: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19094: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19098: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. cerasicola: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. daphniphylli: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. cunninghamiae: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. rhaphiolepidis: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. cilantro: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. solidagae: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 18884: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. theae: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 19497: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. aceris: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. papulans: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. alisalensis: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. broussonetiae: N, E.
Pseudomonas syringae pv. avii: N, E.
LegendThis sequence has been compared to family alignement (MSA) red => minority aminoacid blue => majority aminoacid color intensity => conservation rate title => sequence position(MSA position)aminoacid rate Catalytic site Catalytic site in the MSA MIRVIFLTLMTGAVLAALSGCSPLKLLNTLNPSGPVDHVYNLAYGPDPRN TLDVYTPKAKPAKAPVVVFFYGGSWNSGSKADYAFVGEALAARGMVVIIA DYRLYPQVRYPSFLEDSAKALAWAHKHANTYGGDPSRLYVMGHSAGAYNA AMLALDPRWLAREGLSPSILSGWIGLAGPYDFLPIENPDVKPVFFFPNSP LDSQPINHVTSSAPPALLMASHTDSLVNPKRNTGGLARALREAGVPVRDL YFSRTNHGTLVGAFARLLSGLAPVVDEVDMFVRHTPQTASEKNATGPKAQ
References
1 moreTitle: High-Quality Draft Genome Sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. Syringae Strain SM, Isolated from Wheat Dudnik A, Dudler R Ref: Genome Announc, 1:, 2013 : PubMed
Pseudomonas syringae is one of the most widespread plant pathogens that can cause significant damage to crop plantations. Here, we announce a noncontiguous finished genome sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae strain SM, isolated from hexaploid wheat. The genome sequence revealed the smallest described complement of type III effectors.
BACKGROUND: Hazelnut (Corylus avellana) decline disease in Greece and Italy is caused by the convergent evolution of two distantly related lineages of Pseudomonas syringae pv. avellanae (Pav). We sequenced the genomes of three Pav isolates to determine if their convergent virulence phenotype had a common genetic basis due to either genetic exchange between lineages or parallel evolution. RESULTS: We found little evidence for horizontal transfer (recombination) of genes between Pav lineages, but two large genomic islands (GIs) have been recently acquired by one of the lineages. Evolutionary analyses of the genes encoding type III secreted effectors (T3SEs) that are translocated into host cells and are important for both suppressing and eliciting defense responses show that the two Pav lineages have dramatically different T3SE profiles, with only two shared putatively functional T3SEs. One Pav lineage has undergone unprecedented secretome remodeling, including the acquisition of eleven new T3SEs and the loss or pseudogenization of 15, including five of the six core T3SE families that are present in the other Pav lineage. Molecular dating indicates that divergence within both of the Pav lineages predates their observation in the field. This suggest that both Pav lineages have been cryptically infecting hazelnut trees or wild relatives for many years, and that the emergence of hazelnut decline in the 1970s may have been due to changes in agricultural practice. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that divergent lineages of P. syringae can converge on identical disease etiology on the same host plant using different virulence mechanisms and that dramatic shifts in the arsenal of T3SEs can accompany disease emergence.
The complete genomic sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a (Pss B728a) has been determined and is compared with that of P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000). The two pathovars of this economically important species of plant pathogenic bacteria differ in host range and other interactions with plants, with Pss having a more pronounced epiphytic stage of growth and higher abiotic stress tolerance and Pst DC3000 having a more pronounced apoplastic growth habitat. The Pss B728a genome (6.1 Mb) contains a circular chromosome and no plasmid, whereas the Pst DC3000 genome is 6.5 mbp in size, composed of a circular chromosome and two plasmids. Although a high degree of similarity exists between the two sequenced Pseudomonads, 976 protein-encoding genes are unique to Pss B728a when compared with Pst DC3000, including large genomic islands likely to contribute to virulence and host specificity. Over 375 repetitive extragenic palindromic sequences unique to Pss B728a when compared with Pst DC3000 are widely distributed throughout the chromosome except in 14 genomic islands, which generally had lower GC content than the genome as a whole. Content of the genomic islands varies, with one containing a prophage and another the plasmid pKLC102 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Among the 976 genes of Pss B728a with no counterpart in Pst DC3000 are those encoding for syringopeptin, syringomycin, indole acetic acid biosynthesis, arginine degradation, and production of ice nuclei. The genomic comparison suggests that several unique genes for Pss B728a such as ectoine synthase, DNA repair, and antibiotic production may contribute to the epiphytic fitness and stress tolerance of this organism.
        
1 lessTitle: High-Quality Draft Genome Sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. Syringae Strain SM, Isolated from Wheat Dudnik A, Dudler R Ref: Genome Announc, 1:, 2013 : PubMed
Pseudomonas syringae is one of the most widespread plant pathogens that can cause significant damage to crop plantations. Here, we announce a noncontiguous finished genome sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae strain SM, isolated from hexaploid wheat. The genome sequence revealed the smallest described complement of type III effectors.
BACKGROUND: Hazelnut (Corylus avellana) decline disease in Greece and Italy is caused by the convergent evolution of two distantly related lineages of Pseudomonas syringae pv. avellanae (Pav). We sequenced the genomes of three Pav isolates to determine if their convergent virulence phenotype had a common genetic basis due to either genetic exchange between lineages or parallel evolution. RESULTS: We found little evidence for horizontal transfer (recombination) of genes between Pav lineages, but two large genomic islands (GIs) have been recently acquired by one of the lineages. Evolutionary analyses of the genes encoding type III secreted effectors (T3SEs) that are translocated into host cells and are important for both suppressing and eliciting defense responses show that the two Pav lineages have dramatically different T3SE profiles, with only two shared putatively functional T3SEs. One Pav lineage has undergone unprecedented secretome remodeling, including the acquisition of eleven new T3SEs and the loss or pseudogenization of 15, including five of the six core T3SE families that are present in the other Pav lineage. Molecular dating indicates that divergence within both of the Pav lineages predates their observation in the field. This suggest that both Pav lineages have been cryptically infecting hazelnut trees or wild relatives for many years, and that the emergence of hazelnut decline in the 1970s may have been due to changes in agricultural practice. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that divergent lineages of P. syringae can converge on identical disease etiology on the same host plant using different virulence mechanisms and that dramatic shifts in the arsenal of T3SEs can accompany disease emergence.
Closely related pathogens may differ dramatically in host range, but the molecular, genetic, and evolutionary basis for these differences remains unclear. In many Gram- negative bacteria, including the phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae, type III effectors (TTEs) are essential for pathogenicity, instrumental in structuring host range, and exhibit wide diversity between strains. To capture the dynamic nature of virulence gene repertoires across P. syringae, we screened 11 diverse strains for novel TTE families and coupled this nearly saturating screen with the sequencing and assembly of 14 phylogenetically diverse isolates from a broad collection of diseased host plants. TTE repertoires vary dramatically in size and content across all P. syringae clades; surprisingly few TTEs are conserved and present in all strains. Those that are likely provide basal requirements for pathogenicity. We demonstrate that functional divergence within one conserved locus, hopM1, leads to dramatic differences in pathogenicity, and we demonstrate that phylogenetics-informed mutagenesis can be used to identify functionally critical residues of TTEs. The dynamism of the TTE repertoire is mirrored by diversity in pathways affecting the synthesis of secreted phytotoxins, highlighting the likely role of both types of virulence factors in determination of host range. We used these 14 draft genome sequences, plus five additional genome sequences previously reported, to identify the core genome for P. syringae and we compared this core to that of two closely related non-pathogenic pseudomonad species. These data revealed the recent acquisition of a 1 Mb megaplasmid by a sub-clade of cucumber pathogens. This megaplasmid encodes a type IV secretion system and a diverse set of unknown proteins, which dramatically increases both the genomic content of these strains and the pan-genome of the species.
The complete genomic sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a (Pss B728a) has been determined and is compared with that of P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000). The two pathovars of this economically important species of plant pathogenic bacteria differ in host range and other interactions with plants, with Pss having a more pronounced epiphytic stage of growth and higher abiotic stress tolerance and Pst DC3000 having a more pronounced apoplastic growth habitat. The Pss B728a genome (6.1 Mb) contains a circular chromosome and no plasmid, whereas the Pst DC3000 genome is 6.5 mbp in size, composed of a circular chromosome and two plasmids. Although a high degree of similarity exists between the two sequenced Pseudomonads, 976 protein-encoding genes are unique to Pss B728a when compared with Pst DC3000, including large genomic islands likely to contribute to virulence and host specificity. Over 375 repetitive extragenic palindromic sequences unique to Pss B728a when compared with Pst DC3000 are widely distributed throughout the chromosome except in 14 genomic islands, which generally had lower GC content than the genome as a whole. Content of the genomic islands varies, with one containing a prophage and another the plasmid pKLC102 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Among the 976 genes of Pss B728a with no counterpart in Pst DC3000 are those encoding for syringopeptin, syringomycin, indole acetic acid biosynthesis, arginine degradation, and production of ice nuclei. The genomic comparison suggests that several unique genes for Pss B728a such as ectoine synthase, DNA repair, and antibiotic production may contribute to the epiphytic fitness and stress tolerance of this organism.