(Below N is a link to NCBI taxonomic web page and E link to ESTHER at designed phylum.) > cellular organisms: NE > Bacteria: NE > Proteobacteria: NE > Gammaproteobacteria: NE > Vibrionales: NE > Vibrionaceae: NE > Vibrio: NE > Vibrio cholerae: NE
Warning: This entry is a compilation of different species or line or strain with more than 90% amino acid identity. You can retrieve all strain data
(Below N is a link to NCBI taxonomic web page and E link to ESTHER at designed phylum.) Vibrio cholerae O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae 1587: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae AM-19226: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae 12129(1): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae RC385: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae M66-2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O395: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae MZO-2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae MZO-3: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae 623-39: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae V51: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae MAK 757: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae B33: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae MO10: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae NCTC 8457: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae TM 11079-80: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae RC9: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae TMA 21: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae BX 330286: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae MJ-1236: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CIRS101: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae RC27: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CT 5369-93: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae 2740-80: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae V52: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-33A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-22A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-43A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. 2010EL-1786: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HFU-02: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-28A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-19A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-70A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-38A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae IEC224: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-02A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE48: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-49A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-06A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HCUF01: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-32A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-48A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-40A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-21A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-23A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae LMA3984-4: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-48B2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-09: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae BJG-01: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae INDRE 91/1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-61A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1044(17): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-71A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. NHCC-008D: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-59A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. NHCC-006C: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-62B1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EDC-022: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-50A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-46: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EC-0027: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-55C2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-77A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-1A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-78A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-02C1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. NHCC-004A: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-41A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1038(11): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1041(14): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EM-1626: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. PCS-022: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-43B1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EDC-020: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-55A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-59B1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. Nep-21113: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EM-1546: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-16: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-67A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EM-1676A: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1033(6): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. PCS-023: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-72A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. Inaba G4222: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-64A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-69A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EC-0051: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae PS15: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-7A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-47A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-20A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-45: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-55B2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-80A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. 95412: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-61A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1037(10): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. 87395: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-51A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EM-1727: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EC-0012: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1042(15): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-25: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-60A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-68A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-57A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-81A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1035(8): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1047(20): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1050(23): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-56A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-39A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-56A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1032(5): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1048(21): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1040(13): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-44C1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-37A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-65A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-50A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-17A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. AG-8040: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-41B1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. 116063: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. NHCC-010F: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-46A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EM-1536: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae 4260B: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-81A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-17A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-46B1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-42A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-62A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-57A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. 116059: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EC-0009: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. Nep-21106: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1046(19): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-40: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-52A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. AG-7404: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE39: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1030(3): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-36A1: N, E.
Vibrio sp. RC586: N, E.
Vibrio mimicus VM603: N, E.
Vibrio mimicus VM223: N, E.
Vibrio sp. RC341: N, E.
Vibrio mimicus MB451: N, E.
Vibrio mimicus VM573: N, E.
LegendThis sequence has been compared to family alignement (MSA) red => minority aminoacid blue => majority aminoacid color intensity => conservation rate title => sequence position(MSA position)aminoacid rate Catalytic site Catalytic site in the MSA MFQHAFTDYLVQLQQVNQRWWKEVEQSKAAVNSPLNKAMQEVNLEDSLKF FEQAANQPAALLKVQTQWWEQQLQIWQKVVLESKIQSIMEAEKGDKRFSH EAWQQDPFFNFIKQSYLLFSKTYLDTINAIEGLDEKAKERILFFSRQMIN ALSPSNFIATNPELLRLTLEKNGENLIAGLEQLKEDVASSADILKIRMTN NNAFRLGEDVANTPGEVVFKNEVFELIQYKPLTEQVAVTPLLIVPPFINK YYILDLREKNSMVRWLVEQGHSVFMISWRNPGAAQAQLNFEDYVLEGVVK AVNAIESITGQEQINAAGYCIGGTVLATTIAYYAAKRMKKRIKTASFFTT LLDFSQPGEVGAYINDTIIRAIELQNNAKGYMDGRSLSVTFSLLRENSLY WNYYVDNYLKGQSPVDFDLLYWNSDSTNVAGACHNFLLRELYLENKLVQD KGVKVGGVWIDLDKIKVPSYFISTKEDHIALWQGTYRGALRTGGNKTFVL GESGHIAGIVNHPDKRKYGYWVNDTLDDSAEDWLETAQHREGSWWVHWNE WLNGFADGSKVEPYPLGNADYPVLYSAPGEYVKQVLPIQEA
Whether Vibrio mimicus is a variant of Vibrio cholerae or a separate species has been the subject of taxonomic controversy. A genomic analysis was undertaken to resolve the issue. The genomes of V. mimicus MB451, a clinical isolate, and VM223, an environmental isolate, comprise ca. 4,347,971 and 4,313,453 bp and encode 3,802 and 3,290 ORFs, respectively. As in other vibrios, chromosome I (C-I) predominantly contains genes necessary for growth and viability, whereas chromosome II (C-II) bears genes for adaptation to environmental change. C-I harbors many virulence genes, including some not previously reported in V. mimicus, such as mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin (MSHA), and enterotoxigenic hemolysin (HlyA); C-II encodes a variant of Vibrio pathogenicity island 2 (VPI-2), and Vibrio seventh pandemic island II (VSP-II) cluster of genes. Extensive genomic rearrangement in C-II indicates it is a hot spot for evolution and genesis of speciation for the genus Vibrio. The number of virulence regions discovered in this study (VSP-II, MSHA, HlyA, type IV pilin, PilE, and integron integrase, IntI4) with no notable difference in potential virulence genes between clinical and environmental strains suggests these genes also may play a role in the environment and that pathogenic strains may arise in the environment. Significant genome synteny with prototypic pre-seventh pandemic strains of V. cholerae was observed, and the results of phylogenetic analysis support the hypothesis that, in the course of evolution, V. mimicus and V. cholerae diverged from a common ancestor with a prototypic sixth pandemic genomic backbone.
BACKGROUND: Vibrio taxonomy has been based on a polyphasic approach. In this study, we retrieve useful taxonomic information (i.e. data that can be used to distinguish different taxonomic levels, such as species and genera) from 32 genome sequences of different vibrio species. We use a variety of tools to explore the taxonomic relationship between the sequenced genomes, including Multilocus Sequence Analysis (MLSA), supertrees, Average Amino Acid Identity (AAI), genomic signatures, and Genome BLAST atlases. Our aim is to analyse the usefulness of these tools for species identification in vibrios. RESULTS: We have generated four new genome sequences of three Vibrio species, i.e., V. alginolyticus 40B, V. harveyi-like 1DA3, and V. mimicus strains VM573 and VM603, and present a broad analyses of these genomes along with other sequenced Vibrio species. The genome atlas and pangenome plots provide a tantalizing image of the genomic differences that occur between closely related sister species, e.g. V. cholerae and V. mimicus. The vibrio pangenome contains around 26504 genes. The V. cholerae core genome and pangenome consist of 1520 and 6923 genes, respectively. Pangenomes might allow different strains of V. cholerae to occupy different niches. MLSA and supertree analyses resulted in a similar phylogenetic picture, with a clear distinction of four groups (Vibrio core group, V. cholerae-V. mimicus, Aliivibrio spp., and Photobacterium spp.). A Vibrio species is defined as a group of strains that share > 95% DNA identity in MLSA and supertree analysis, > 96% AAI, < or = 10 genome signature dissimilarity, and > 61% proteome identity. Strains of the same species and species of the same genus will form monophyletic groups on the basis of MLSA and supertree. CONCLUSION: The combination of different analytical and bioinformatics tools will enable the most accurate species identification through genomic computational analysis. This endeavour will culminate in the birth of the online genomic taxonomy whereby researchers and end-users of taxonomy will be able to identify their isolates through a web-based server. This novel approach to microbial systematics will result in a tremendous advance concerning biodiversity discovery, description, and understanding.
Here we determine the complete genomic sequence of the gram negative, gamma-Proteobacterium Vibrio cholerae El Tor N16961 to be 4,033,460 base pairs (bp). The genome consists of two circular chromosomes of 2,961,146 bp and 1,072,314 bp that together encode 3,885 open reading frames. The vast majority of recognizable genes for essential cell functions (such as DNA replication, transcription, translation and cell-wall biosynthesis) and pathogenicity (for example, toxins, surface antigens and adhesins) are located on the large chromosome. In contrast, the small chromosome contains a larger fraction (59%) of hypothetical genes compared with the large chromosome (42%), and also contains many more genes that appear to have origins other than the gamma-Proteobacteria. The small chromosome also carries a gene capture system (the integron island) and host 'addiction' genes that are typically found on plasmids; thus, the small chromosome may have originally been a megaplasmid that was captured by an ancestral Vibrio species. The V. cholerae genomic sequence provides a starting point for understanding how a free-living, environmental organism emerged to become a significant human bacterial pathogen.
Whether Vibrio mimicus is a variant of Vibrio cholerae or a separate species has been the subject of taxonomic controversy. A genomic analysis was undertaken to resolve the issue. The genomes of V. mimicus MB451, a clinical isolate, and VM223, an environmental isolate, comprise ca. 4,347,971 and 4,313,453 bp and encode 3,802 and 3,290 ORFs, respectively. As in other vibrios, chromosome I (C-I) predominantly contains genes necessary for growth and viability, whereas chromosome II (C-II) bears genes for adaptation to environmental change. C-I harbors many virulence genes, including some not previously reported in V. mimicus, such as mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin (MSHA), and enterotoxigenic hemolysin (HlyA); C-II encodes a variant of Vibrio pathogenicity island 2 (VPI-2), and Vibrio seventh pandemic island II (VSP-II) cluster of genes. Extensive genomic rearrangement in C-II indicates it is a hot spot for evolution and genesis of speciation for the genus Vibrio. The number of virulence regions discovered in this study (VSP-II, MSHA, HlyA, type IV pilin, PilE, and integron integrase, IntI4) with no notable difference in potential virulence genes between clinical and environmental strains suggests these genes also may play a role in the environment and that pathogenic strains may arise in the environment. Significant genome synteny with prototypic pre-seventh pandemic strains of V. cholerae was observed, and the results of phylogenetic analysis support the hypothesis that, in the course of evolution, V. mimicus and V. cholerae diverged from a common ancestor with a prototypic sixth pandemic genomic backbone.
Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of cholera, is a bacterium autochthonous to the aquatic environment, and a serious public health threat. V. cholerae serogroup O1 is responsible for the previous two cholera pandemics, in which classical and El Tor biotypes were dominant in the sixth and the current seventh pandemics, respectively. Cholera researchers continually face newly emerging and reemerging pathogenic clones carrying diverse combinations of phenotypic and genotypic properties, which significantly hampered control of the disease. To elucidate evolutionary mechanisms governing genetic diversity of pandemic V. cholerae, we compared the genome sequences of 23 V. cholerae strains isolated from a variety of sources over the past 98 years. The genome-based phylogeny revealed 12 distinct V. cholerae lineages, of which one comprises both O1 classical and El Tor biotypes. All seventh pandemic clones share nearly identical gene content. Using analogy to influenza virology, we define the transition from sixth to seventh pandemic strains as a "shift" between pathogenic clones belonging to the same O1 serogroup, but from significantly different phyletic lineages. In contrast, transition among clones during the present pandemic period is characterized as a "drift" between clones, differentiated mainly by varying composition of laterally transferred genomic islands, resulting in emergence of variants, exemplified by V. cholerae O139 and V. cholerae O1 El Tor hybrid clones. Based on the comparative genomics it is concluded that V. cholerae undergoes extensive genetic recombination via lateral gene transfer, and, therefore, genome assortment, not serogroup, should be used to define pathogenic V. cholerae clones.
        
Title: Genomic analysis of a novel integrative conjugative element in Vibrio cholerae Taviani E, Grim CJ, Chun J, Huq A, Colwell RR Ref: FEBS Letters, 583:3630, 2009 : PubMed
Integrative conjugative elements (ICEs) are a class of self-transmissible mobile elements that mediate horizontal gene transfer in bacteria, and play an important role in bacterial evolution. Since 1992, ICEs of the SXT/R391 family have been found to be widely distributed among Vibrio cholerae strains isolated in Asian countries. Here we describe ICEVchB33, an ICE found in the genomes of two V. cholerae O1 Eltor strains, one isolated in India, 1994, and the other from Mozambique, 2004. ICEVchB33 revealed a new genetic organization, different from other ICEs of the SXT/R391 family, demonstrating the genomic plasticity of these elements.
BACKGROUND: Vibrio taxonomy has been based on a polyphasic approach. In this study, we retrieve useful taxonomic information (i.e. data that can be used to distinguish different taxonomic levels, such as species and genera) from 32 genome sequences of different vibrio species. We use a variety of tools to explore the taxonomic relationship between the sequenced genomes, including Multilocus Sequence Analysis (MLSA), supertrees, Average Amino Acid Identity (AAI), genomic signatures, and Genome BLAST atlases. Our aim is to analyse the usefulness of these tools for species identification in vibrios. RESULTS: We have generated four new genome sequences of three Vibrio species, i.e., V. alginolyticus 40B, V. harveyi-like 1DA3, and V. mimicus strains VM573 and VM603, and present a broad analyses of these genomes along with other sequenced Vibrio species. The genome atlas and pangenome plots provide a tantalizing image of the genomic differences that occur between closely related sister species, e.g. V. cholerae and V. mimicus. The vibrio pangenome contains around 26504 genes. The V. cholerae core genome and pangenome consist of 1520 and 6923 genes, respectively. Pangenomes might allow different strains of V. cholerae to occupy different niches. MLSA and supertree analyses resulted in a similar phylogenetic picture, with a clear distinction of four groups (Vibrio core group, V. cholerae-V. mimicus, Aliivibrio spp., and Photobacterium spp.). A Vibrio species is defined as a group of strains that share > 95% DNA identity in MLSA and supertree analysis, > 96% AAI, < or = 10 genome signature dissimilarity, and > 61% proteome identity. Strains of the same species and species of the same genus will form monophyletic groups on the basis of MLSA and supertree. CONCLUSION: The combination of different analytical and bioinformatics tools will enable the most accurate species identification through genomic computational analysis. This endeavour will culminate in the birth of the online genomic taxonomy whereby researchers and end-users of taxonomy will be able to identify their isolates through a web-based server. This novel approach to microbial systematics will result in a tremendous advance concerning biodiversity discovery, description, and understanding.
Here we determine the complete genomic sequence of the gram negative, gamma-Proteobacterium Vibrio cholerae El Tor N16961 to be 4,033,460 base pairs (bp). The genome consists of two circular chromosomes of 2,961,146 bp and 1,072,314 bp that together encode 3,885 open reading frames. The vast majority of recognizable genes for essential cell functions (such as DNA replication, transcription, translation and cell-wall biosynthesis) and pathogenicity (for example, toxins, surface antigens and adhesins) are located on the large chromosome. In contrast, the small chromosome contains a larger fraction (59%) of hypothetical genes compared with the large chromosome (42%), and also contains many more genes that appear to have origins other than the gamma-Proteobacteria. The small chromosome also carries a gene capture system (the integron island) and host 'addiction' genes that are typically found on plasmids; thus, the small chromosome may have originally been a megaplasmid that was captured by an ancestral Vibrio species. The V. cholerae genomic sequence provides a starting point for understanding how a free-living, environmental organism emerged to become a significant human bacterial pathogen.