| Title : A comparative assessment of treatment methods to release ferulic and p-cumaric acids from Brewer's Spent Grains - Bucci_2024_Waste.Manag_188_39 |
| Author(s) : Bucci P , Casas A , Martins P , Meyer A , Cantero D , Munoz R |
| Ref : Waste Manag , 188 :39 , 2024 |
|
Abstract :
Brewers' spent grain (BSG) is the main byproduct from the brewing industry, which accounts for 85 % of the total waste generated during beer production. This lignocellulosic material is traditionally used as livestock feed and sold at a low price. However, BSG can be used as a low-cost feedstock for the production of bioactive molecules and chemicals precursors, upgrading the value of this byproduct. In this context, BSG is a promising feedstock for the extraction of antioxidants like ferulic acid (FA) and p-coumaric acid (p-Cu). The effectiveness of three hydrolysis treatments were evaluated for the extraction of FA and p-Cu from BSG, namely enzymatic (based on the synergistic cooperation between a feruloyl esterase and an endo-1,4-beta-xylanase), alkaline and hydrothermal. The hydrothermal treatment produced the highest extraction yields (7.2 g/kgBSG and 1.4 g/kgBSG for FA and p-Cu, respectively) in a short extraction time (an hour). On the other hand, enzymatic hydrolysis extracted 4.3 g/kgBSG for FA and negligible yields for p-Cu in 4 h of incubation at 25 degreesC. Yields of 5.5 g/kgBSG for FA and 0.6 g/kgBSG for p-Cu were obtained in more than 5 h of alkaline treatment at 120 degreesC. The mass and energy balances revealed the high dependence of the operating costs on the concentration of BSG used during the extraction process, with costs of 34.5 , 6607 and 205.5 per kg of FA for the chemical, enzymatic and hydrothermal extraction methods at 100 kg BSG/m(3). |
| PubMedSearch : Bucci_2024_Waste.Manag_188_39 |
| PubMedID: 39098271 |
Bucci P, Casas A, Martins P, Meyer A, Cantero D, Munoz R (2024)
A comparative assessment of treatment methods to release ferulic and p-cumaric acids from Brewer's Spent Grains
Waste Manag
188 :39
Bucci P, Casas A, Martins P, Meyer A, Cantero D, Munoz R (2024)
Waste Manag
188 :39