Devlin_1993_Br.J.Anaesth_71_227

Reference

Title : Pharmacodynamics of mivacurium chloride in patients with hepatic cirrhosis - Devlin_1993_Br.J.Anaesth_71_227
Author(s) : Devlin JC , Head-Rapson AG , Parker CJ , Hunter JM
Ref : British Journal of Anaesthesia , 71 :227 , 1993
Abstract :

Ten healthy patients and 25 patients with cirrhosis of the liver (10 Child's A, 10 Child's B and 5 Child's C) received a bolus dose of mivacurium chloride 150 micrograms kg-1. The electromyographic response was monitored throughout anaesthesia until recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four (TOF) (T1/T0) to at least 85% and the TOF ratio (T4:T1) to at least 80%. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the onset of neuromuscular block, but recovery was prolonged in the cirrhotic group compared with the healthy patients (respective mean times to recovery of T1/T0: to 5% = 20.2 vs 11.2 min (P < 0.05); to 10% = 23.8 vs 13.4 min (P < 0.005); to 25% = 28.4 vs 16.6 min (P < 0.005); to 50% = 41.1 vs 20.1 min (P < 0.005); to 75% = 43.8 vs 24.9 min (P < 0.005). Recovery of T4:T1 to 70% = 48.1 vs 27.4 min (P < 0.005)). Recovery was most prolonged in the Child's C patients. Mean plasma cholinesterase activity was less in the cirrhotic compared with the healthy group (mean 582 (SD 254) iu litre-1 vs 1125 (303) iu litre-1) (P < 0.001) and there was a significant negative correlation between plasma cholinesterase activity and all the indices of recovery (P < 0.001 for all except recovery index (P < 0.01)). We conclude that patients with hepatic cirrhosis may be sensitive to mivacurium, which could be explained, at least in part, by the lesser plasma cholinesterase activity.

PubMedSearch : Devlin_1993_Br.J.Anaesth_71_227
PubMedID: 8123397

Related information

Inhibitor Mivacurium

Citations formats

Devlin JC, Head-Rapson AG, Parker CJ, Hunter JM (1993)
Pharmacodynamics of mivacurium chloride in patients with hepatic cirrhosis
British Journal of Anaesthesia 71 :227

Devlin JC, Head-Rapson AG, Parker CJ, Hunter JM (1993)
British Journal of Anaesthesia 71 :227