Kamimura_2017_BMC.Cancer_17_322

Reference

Title : Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial - Kamimura_2017_BMC.Cancer_17_322
Author(s) : Kamimura K , Suda T , Yokoo T , Kamimura H , Kanefuji T , Tsuchiya A , Takamura M , Kawai H , Waguri N , Yamagiwa S , Terai S
Ref : BMC Cancer , 17 :322 , 2017
Abstract :

BACKGROUND: Based on promising results from a Phase I study of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and cisplatin powder (DDP-H) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (UMIN-CTR000003541), a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy versus miriplatin monotherapy.
METHODS: Nineteen patients, five and fourteen Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging classification A and B cases, respectively, were randomly assigned to receive either miriplatin monotherapy (n = 9) or miriplatin/DDP-H combination therapy (n = 10). DDP-H and/or miriplatin were administered through the hepatic arteries supplying the lobes of the liver containing tumors, and progression free survival was analyzed as a primary end point in addition to other secondary endpoints. The corresponding therapy was repeated unless disease progression or severe adverse events were recorded.
RESULTS: The monotherapy or combination therapy was performed for 15 or 36 sessions in total, respectively. Although there were no significant differences between the two groups for treatment intervals (p = 0.96) or the dose of miriplatin used in each session (p = 0.99), the progression free survival and overall disease control rate were significantly better in the combination therapy group (91 vs 423 days, p = 0.025; 40.0 vs 77.8%, p = 0.0025, respectively). Consistent with these observations, a trend of a significantly slower increase in des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin was observed, and the number of treatment sessions was nearly significantly larger in the combination therapy group (p < 0.0001, p = 0.057, respectively). Conversely, the median survival time did not show a significant difference (706 days, monotherapy vs 733 days, combination therapy; p = 0.40). A significant decrease in cholinesterase was observed during the course of treatment only in patients receiving combination therapy (r = -0.86, p < 0.0001). A few cases in both arms showed hematological and/or non-hematological toxicities that were categorized as grade 1 (NCI-CTCAE).
CONCLUSIONS: The higher disease control effects with the combination of miriplatin and DDP-H indicate that it is a promising alternative treatment for cases with multiple HCCs, especially for those that can tolerate the treatment without experiencing a reduction in hepatic reserve. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on 1 January 2012 with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm , UMIN000004691).

PubMedSearch : Kamimura_2017_BMC.Cancer_17_322
PubMedID: 28490356

Related information

Citations formats

Kamimura K, Suda T, Yokoo T, Kamimura H, Kanefuji T, Tsuchiya A, Takamura M, Kawai H, Waguri N, Yamagiwa S, Terai S (2017)
Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
BMC Cancer 17 :322

Kamimura K, Suda T, Yokoo T, Kamimura H, Kanefuji T, Tsuchiya A, Takamura M, Kawai H, Waguri N, Yamagiwa S, Terai S (2017)
BMC Cancer 17 :322