Maurice_2016_Behav.Brain.Res_296_351

Reference

Title : Learning performances and vulnerability to amyloid toxicity in the butyrylcholinesterase knockout mouse - Maurice_2016_Behav.Brain.Res_296_351
Author(s) : Maurice T , Strehaiano M , Simeon N , Bertrand C , Chatonnet A
Ref : Behavioural Brain Research , 296 :351 , 2016
Abstract :

Butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) is an important enzyme for detoxication and metabolism of ester compounds. It also hydrolyzes the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) in pathological conditions and may play a role in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We here compared the learning ability and vulnerability to Abeta toxicity in male and female BChE knockout (KO) mice and their 129Sv wild-type (Wt) controls. Animals tested for place learning in the water-maze showed increased acquisition slopes and presence in the training quadrant during the probe test. An increased passive avoidance response was also observed for males. BChE KO mice therefore showed enhanced learning ability in spatial and non-spatial memory tests. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of increasing doses of amyloid-beta[25-35] (Abeta25-35) peptide oligomers resulted, in Wt mice, in learning and memory deficits, oxidative stress and decrease in ACh hippocampal content. In BChE KO mice, the Abeta25-35-induced deficit in place learning was attenuated in males and blocked in females. No change in lipid peroxidation or ACh levels was observed after Abeta25-35 treatment in male or female BChE KO mice. These data showed that the genetic invalidation of BChE in mice augmented learning capacities and lowered the vulnerability to Abeta toxicity.

PubMedSearch : Maurice_2016_Behav.Brain.Res_296_351
PubMedID: 26306824

Related information

Citations formats

Maurice T, Strehaiano M, Simeon N, Bertrand C, Chatonnet A (2016)
Learning performances and vulnerability to amyloid toxicity in the butyrylcholinesterase knockout mouse
Behavioural Brain Research 296 :351

Maurice T, Strehaiano M, Simeon N, Bertrand C, Chatonnet A (2016)
Behavioural Brain Research 296 :351