| Title : Comparative in vitro pediculicidal efficacy of treatments in a resistant head lice population in the United States - Meinking_2002_Arch.Dermatol_138_220 |
| Author(s) : Meinking TL , Serrano L , Hard B , Entzel P , Lemard G , Rivera E , Villar ME |
| Ref : Arch Dermatol , 138 :220 , 2002 |
|
Abstract :
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the pediculicidal activity of 5 head lice products available in the United States on head lice from south Florida.
DESIGN:
In vitro pediculicidal product comparison.
SETTING:
Lice Source Services, Inc, located in Plantation, Fla, a clinic for the treatment and grooming of individuals with pediculosis capitis.
PARTICIPANTS:
Head lice were collected from healthy clients with Pediculus capitis that came to Lice Source Services, Inc, to seek their services.
INTERVENTIONS:
Within 2 to 6 hours of capture, lice were placed in continuous direct contact with the pediculicide products and observed at regular intervals. Results were compared with findings of a recent study of a treatment-sensitive population of head lice conducted in Panama.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
Percentage of lice dead at regular observation intervals between 5 minutes and 3 hours of continuous exposure to the pediculicides.
RESULTS:
Two prescription products, Ovide lotion (0.5% malathion) and 1% lindane shampoo, were ranked in the same order as in 2 previous studies (first and last, respectively). The order of effectiveness from most to least effective was as follows: Ovide lotion, A-200 shampoo (a natural pyrethrin product synergized with piperonyl butoxide), undiluted Nix (1% permethrin), diluted Nix, RID (a natural pyrethrin product synergized with piperonyl butoxide), and 1% lindane shampoo.
|
| PubMedSearch : Meinking_2002_Arch.Dermatol_138_220 |
| PubMedID: 11843643 |
Meinking TL, Serrano L, Hard B, Entzel P, Lemard G, Rivera E, Villar ME (2002)
Comparative in vitro pediculicidal efficacy of treatments in a resistant head lice population in the United States
Arch Dermatol
138 :220
Meinking TL, Serrano L, Hard B, Entzel P, Lemard G, Rivera E, Villar ME (2002)
Arch Dermatol
138 :220