Rhodes_2001_Brain.Res.Bull_54_681

Reference

Title : Male-female differences in rat hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to nicotine stimulation - Rhodes_2001_Brain.Res.Bull_54_681
Author(s) : Rhodes ME , O'Toole SM , Czambel RK , Rubin RT
Ref : Brain Research Bulletin , 54 :681 , 2001
Abstract :

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis responsiveness differs physiologically and pharmacologically between the sexes (sexual diergism). Central nicotinic receptors modulate this endocrine axis. Previous studies have established that nicotine (NIC) stimulates the HPA axis; however, only male animals have been used. We have demonstrated that plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) concentrations showed greater responsiveness in male than in female rats pretreated with scopolamine (SCOP), a muscarinic antagonist, followed by physostigmine (PHYSO), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. These results suggest that the SCOP + PHYSO effects may have resulted from an indirect nicotinic effect caused by increased synaptic acetylcholine with simultaneous muscarinic antagonism. In the present study, we investigated nicotinic cholinergic influences on HPA axis activity in male and female rats by administering NIC (0, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, or 0.5 mg/kg) and determining plasma AVP, ACTH, and corticosterone (CORT) responses. Male rats had a significantly greater, dose-related AVP response to NIC than did females. In contrast, female rats had significantly greater, dose-related ACTH and CORT responses to NIC than did males. Hormone responses following NIC were similar to hormone responses following SCOP + PHYSO. These results suggest nicotinic receptors influence the HPA axis differentially in male and female rats.

PubMedSearch : Rhodes_2001_Brain.Res.Bull_54_681
PubMedID: 11403996

Related information

Citations formats

Rhodes ME, O'Toole SM, Czambel RK, Rubin RT (2001)
Male-female differences in rat hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to nicotine stimulation
Brain Research Bulletin 54 :681

Rhodes ME, O'Toole SM, Czambel RK, Rubin RT (2001)
Brain Research Bulletin 54 :681