Sollini_2021_Eur.J.Nucl.Med.Mol.Imaging_48_4396

Reference

Title : State-of-the-art of FAPI-PET imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Sollini_2021_Eur.J.Nucl.Med.Mol.Imaging_48_4396
Author(s) : Sollini M , Kirienko M , Gelardi F , Fiz F , Gozzi N , Chiti A
Ref : Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging , 48 :4396 , 2021
Abstract :

INTRODUCTION: Fibroblast activation protein-alpha (FAPalpha) is overexpressed on cancer-associated fibroblasts in approximately 90% of epithelial neoplasms, representing an appealing target for therapeutic and molecular imaging applications. [(68) Ga]Ga-labelled radiopharmaceuticals-FAP-inhibitors (FAPI)-have been developed for PET. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed published literature to provide an overview of its clinical role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search, limited to January 1st, 2018-March 31st, 2021, was performed on MedLine and Embase databases using all the possible combinations of terms "FAP", "FAPI", "PET/CT", "positron emission tomography", "fibroblast", "cancer-associated fibroblasts", "CAF", "molecular imaging", and "fibroblast imaging". Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 criteria. Patient-based and lesion-based pooled sensitivities/specificities of FAPI PET were computed using a random-effects model directly from the STATA "metaprop" command. Between-study statistical heterogeneity was tested (I(2)-statistics). RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were selected for systematic review. Investigations on staging or restaging head and neck cancer (n = 2, 29 patients), abdominal malignancies (n = 6, 171 patients), various cancers (n = 2, 143 patients), and radiation treatment planning (n = 4, 56 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. On patient-based analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.00) with negligible heterogeneity; pooled specificity was 0.87 (95% CI 0.62-1.00), with negligible heterogeneity. On lesion-based analysis, sensitivity and specificity had high heterogeneity (I(2) = 88.56% and I(2) = 97.20%, respectively). Pooled sensitivity for the primary tumour was 1.00 (95% CI 0.98-1.00) with negligible heterogeneity. Pooled sensitivity/specificity of nodal metastases had high heterogeneity (I(2) = 89.18% and I(2) = 95.74%, respectively). Pooled sensitivity in distant metastases was good (0.93 with 95% CI 0.88-0.97) with negligible heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: FAPI-PET appears promising, especially in imaging cancers unsuitable for [(18)F]FDG imaging, particularly primary lesions and distant metastases. However, high-level evidence is needed to define its role, specifically to identify cancer types, non-oncological diseases, and clinical settings for its applications.

PubMedSearch : Sollini_2021_Eur.J.Nucl.Med.Mol.Imaging_48_4396
PubMedID: 34173007

Related information

Citations formats

Sollini M, Kirienko M, Gelardi F, Fiz F, Gozzi N, Chiti A (2021)
State-of-the-art of FAPI-PET imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48 :4396

Sollini M, Kirienko M, Gelardi F, Fiz F, Gozzi N, Chiti A (2021)
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48 :4396