Holler_1997_Biochem.Biophys.Res.Commun_236_754

Reference

Title : The membrane anchor of microsomal epoxide hydrolase from human, rat, and rabbit displays an unexpected membrane topology - Holler_1997_Biochem.Biophys.Res.Commun_236_754
Author(s) : Holler R , Arand M , Mecky A , Oesch F , Friedberg T
Ref : Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications , 236 :754 , 1997
Abstract :

The microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) and cytochrome P450s catalyze the sequential formation of carcinogenic metabolites. According to one algorithm for predicting the membrane topology of proteins, the human, the rabbit, and the rat mEH should adopt a type II topology. The type II topology is also predicted by a recently established neuronal network which is trained to recognize signal peptides with very high accuracy. In contrast to these predictions we find, based on N-glycosylation analysis in a cell-free and in a cellular system, that the membrane anchor of human, rat, and rabbit mEH displays a type I topology. This result is correctly predicted by the positive inside rule in which negatively charged residues, the distribution of which differs in the mEH membrane anchor of these species, have only a modulating role for the membrane topology of proteins. However, our results demonstrate that this role is not strong enough to force the mEHs into a type II topology, not even in the case of the rabbit mEH, in which the only positively charged residue in the C-terminal part of the topogenic sequence is flanked by five negatively charged residues.

PubMedSearch : Holler_1997_Biochem.Biophys.Res.Commun_236_754
PubMedID: 9245728
Gene_locus related to this paper: ratno-hyep

Related information

Gene_locus ratno-hyep

Citations formats

Holler R, Arand M, Mecky A, Oesch F, Friedberg T (1997)
The membrane anchor of microsomal epoxide hydrolase from human, rat, and rabbit displays an unexpected membrane topology
Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications 236 :754

Holler R, Arand M, Mecky A, Oesch F, Friedberg T (1997)
Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications 236 :754