Title : Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of (68) Ga-FAPI-04 PET\/MR and (18)F-FDG PET\/CT in patients with pancreatic cancer - Zhang_2022_Eur.J.Nucl.Med.Mol.Imaging_49_2877 |
Author(s) : Zhang Z , Jia G , Pan G , Cao K , Yang Q , Meng H , Yang J , Zhang L , Wang T , Cheng C , Zuo C |
Ref : Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging , 49 :2877 , 2022 |
Abstract :
PURPOSE: We sought to assess the performance of (68) Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR for the diagnosis of primary tumours as well as metastatic lesions in patients with pancreatic cancer and to compare the results with those of (18)F-FDG PET/CT. METHODS: Prospectively, we evaluated 33 patients suspected to have pancreatic adenocarcinoma, of whom thirty-two were confirmed by histopathology, and one had autoimmune pancreatitis confirmed by needle biopsy and glucocorticoid treatment. Within 1 week, each patient underwent both (68) Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Comparisons of the detection abilities for primary tumours, lymph nodes, and metastases were conducted for the two imaging approaches. The original maximum standard uptake values (SUV(max)) and normalised SUV(max) (SUV(max)/SUV(bkgd)) of paired lesions on (68) Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and (18)F-FDG PET/CT were measured and compared. RESULTS: Thirty pancreatic cancer patients and three pancreatitis patients were enrolled. (68) Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and (18)F-FDG PET/CT exhibited equivalent (100%) detection rates for primary tumours. The original/normalised SUV(max) of primary tumours on (68) Ga-FAPI-04 PET was markedly higher than that on (18)F-FDG (p < 0.05). Sixteen pancreatic cancer patients had pancreatic parenchymal uptake, whereas (18)F-FDG PET images showed parenchymal uptake in only four patients (53.33% vs. 13.33%, p < 0.001). (68) Ga-FAPI-04 PET detected more positive lymph nodes than (18)F-FDG PET (42 vs. 30, p < 0.001), while (18)F-FDG PET was able to detect more liver metastases than (68) Ga-FAPI-04 (181 vs. 104, p < 0.001). In addition, multisequence MR imaging helped explain ten pancreatic cancers that could not be definitively revealed due to (68) Ga-FAPI-04 inflammatory uptake and identified more liver metastases than (18)F-FDG (256 vs. 181, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: (68) Ga-FAPI-04 PET might be better than (18)F-FDG PET in the detection of suspicious lymph node metastases. MR multiple sequence imaging of (68) Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR was helpful for explaining pancreatic lesions in patients with obstructive inflammation and detecting tiny liver metastases. |
PubMedSearch : Zhang_2022_Eur.J.Nucl.Med.Mol.Imaging_49_2877 |
PubMedID: 35243518 |
Inhibitor | FAPI-04 |
Zhang Z, Jia G, Pan G, Cao K, Yang Q, Meng H, Yang J, Zhang L, Wang T, Cheng C, Zuo C (2022)
Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of (68) Ga-FAPI-04 PET\/MR and (18)F-FDG PET\/CT in patients with pancreatic cancer
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
49 :2877
Zhang Z, Jia G, Pan G, Cao K, Yang Q, Meng H, Yang J, Zhang L, Wang T, Cheng C, Zuo C (2022)
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
49 :2877