Gene_locus Report for: mouse-EPHX1

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) hydrolyzes a wide range of epoxide containing molecules. Although involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics, recent studies associate mEH with the onset and development of certain disease conditions. This phenomenon is partially attributed to the significant role mEH plays in hydrolyzing endogenous lipid mediators, suggesting more complex and extensive physiological functions. In order to obtain pharmacological tools to further study the biology and therapeutic potential of this enzyme target, we describe the development of highly potent 2-alkylthio acetamide inhibitors of the human mEH with IC50 values in the low nanomolar range. These are around 2 orders of magnitude more potent than previously obtained primary amine, amide and urea-based mEH inhibitors. Experimental assay results and rationalization of binding through docking calculations of inhibitors to a mEH homology model indicate that an amide connected to an alkyl side chain and a benzyl-thio function as key pharmacophore units.

Microsomal and soluble epoxide hydrolase (mEH and sEH) fulfill apparently distinct roles: Whereas mEH detoxifies xenobiotics, sEH hydrolyzes fatty acid (FA) signaling molecules and is thus implicated in a variety of physiological functions. These epoxy FAs comprise epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) and epoxy-octadecenoic acids (EpOMEs), which are formed by CYP epoxygenases from arachidonic acid (AA) and linoleic acid, respectively, and then are hydrolyzed to their respective diols, the so-called DHETs and DiHOMEs. Although EETs and EpOMEs are also substrates for mEH, its role in lipid signaling is considered minor due to lower abundance and activity relative to sEH. Surprisingly, we found that in plasma from mEH KO mice, hydrolysis rates for 8,9-EET and 9,10-EpOME were reduced by 50% compared to WT plasma. This strongly suggests that mEH contributes substantially to the turnover of these FA epoxides-despite kinetic parameters being in favor of sEH. Given the crucial role of liver in controlling plasma diol levels, we next studied the capacity of sEH and mEH KO liver microsomes to synthesize DHETs with varying concentrations of AA (1-30 muM) and NADPH. mEH-generated DHET levels were similar to the ones generated by sEH, when AA concentrations were low (1 muM) or epoxygenase activity was curbed by modulating NADPH. With increasing AA concentrations sEH became more dominant and with 30 muM AA produced twice the level of DHETs compared to mEH. Immunohistochemistry of C57BL/6 liver slices further revealed that mEH expression was more widespread than sEH expression. mEH immunoreactivity was detected in hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, endothelial cells, and bile duct epithelial cells, while sEH immunoreactivity was confined to hepatocytes and bile duct epithelial cells. Finally, transcriptome analysis of WT, mEH KO, and sEH KO liver was carried out to discern transcriptional changes associated with the loss of EH genes along the CYP-epoxygenase-EH axis. We found several prominent dysregulations occurring in a parallel manner in both KO livers: (a) gene expression of Ephx1 (encoding for mEH protein) was increased 1.35-fold in sEH KO, while expression of Ephx2 (encoding for sEH protein) was increased 1.4-fold in mEH KO liver; (b) Cyp2c genes, encoding for the predominant epoxygenases in mouse liver, were mostly dysregulated in the same manner in both sEH and mEH KO mice, showing that loss of either EH has a similar impact. Taken together, mEH appears to play a leading role in the hydrolysis of 8,9-EET and 9,10-EpOME and also contributes to the hydrolysis of other FA epoxides. It probably profits from its high affinity for FA epoxides under non-saturating conditions and its close physical proximity to CYP epoxygenases, and compensates its lower abundance by a more widespread expression, being the only EH present in several sEH-lacking cell types.

Heat lability of the mouse hepatic microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 enzyme-specific activity (EC 3.3.2.3) is greater for the A/J than the C57BL/6J strain. Analysis of the microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 cDNA coding sequences shows the C57BL/6J and A/J strains to differ in a single base, a C to T transition at position 1012 from the ATG. This change would predict a substitution of an Arg for a Cys at codon 338. Lyman et al. (J. Biol. Chem 255:8650, 1980) studied 26 inbred mouse strains and assigned each strain to one of two groups based upon functional criteria that included heat lability and pH optima for microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1. The heat-labile strains including A/J were denoted with the Ephx1(d) allele, whereas C57BL/6J and other members of the heat-stable strains were denoted with the Ephx1(b) allele. We examined those same inbred mouse strains and found complete concordance between the assignment of microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 allele superscript "b" or "d" and the wild-type and C1012T polymorphism respectively (Fisher's Exact Test, two-sided p < 0.0001). These data suggest that mouse hepatic microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 heat lability is associated with the presence of a Cys at residue 338. Genomic samples from the available AXB and BXA recombinant inbred strains were allelotyped for the SNP identified in the Ephx1 gene that distinguishes the A/J and C57BL/6J parental strains and used to map Ephx1 to Chromosome (Chr) 1 at approximately 98.5cM (LOD = 10.0).

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) hydrolyzes a wide range of epoxide containing molecules. Although involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics, recent studies associate mEH with the onset and development of certain disease conditions. This phenomenon is partially attributed to the significant role mEH plays in hydrolyzing endogenous lipid mediators, suggesting more complex and extensive physiological functions. In order to obtain pharmacological tools to further study the biology and therapeutic potential of this enzyme target, we describe the development of highly potent 2-alkylthio acetamide inhibitors of the human mEH with IC50 values in the low nanomolar range. These are around 2 orders of magnitude more potent than previously obtained primary amine, amide and urea-based mEH inhibitors. Experimental assay results and rationalization of binding through docking calculations of inhibitors to a mEH homology model indicate that an amide connected to an alkyl side chain and a benzyl-thio function as key pharmacophore units.

Stimuli such as inflammation or hypoxia induce cytochrome P450 epoxygenase-mediated production of arachidonic acid-derived epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs). EETs have cardioprotective, vasodilatory, angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic effects, which are diminished by EET hydrolysis yielding biologically less active dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acids (DHETs). Previous in vitro assays have suggested that epoxide hydrolase 2 (EPHX2) is responsible for nearly all EET hydrolysis. EPHX1, which exhibits slow EET hydrolysis in vitro, is thought to contribute only marginally to EET hydrolysis. Using Ephx1(-/-), Ephx2(-/-), and Ephx1(-/-)Ephx2(-/-) mice, we show here that EPHX1 significantly contributes to EET hydrolysis in vivo Disruption of Ephx1 and/or Ephx2 genes did not induce compensatory changes in expression of other Ephx genes or CYP2 family epoxygenases. Plasma levels of 8,9-, 11,12-, and 14,15-DHET were reduced by 38, 44, and 67% in Ephx2(-/-) mice compared with wildtype (WT) mice, respectively; however, plasma from Ephx1(-/-)Ephx2(-/-) mice exhibited significantly greater reduction (100, 99, and 96%) of those respective DHETs. Kinetic assays and FRET experiments indicated that EPHX1 is a slow EET scavenger, but hydrolyzes EETs in a coupled reaction with cytochrome P450 to limit basal EET levels. Moreover, we also found that EPHX1 activities are biologically relevant, as Ephx1(-/-)Ephx2(-/-) hearts had significantly better postischemic functional recovery (71%) than both WT (31%) and Ephx2(-/-) (51%) hearts. These findings indicate that Ephx1(-/-)Ephx2(-/-) mice are a valuable model for assessing EET-mediated effects, uncover a new paradigm for EET metabolism, and suggest that dual EPHX1 and EPHX2 inhibition may represent a therapeutic approach to manage human pathologies such as myocardial infarction.

Microsomal and soluble epoxide hydrolase (mEH and sEH) fulfill apparently distinct roles: Whereas mEH detoxifies xenobiotics, sEH hydrolyzes fatty acid (FA) signaling molecules and is thus implicated in a variety of physiological functions. These epoxy FAs comprise epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) and epoxy-octadecenoic acids (EpOMEs), which are formed by CYP epoxygenases from arachidonic acid (AA) and linoleic acid, respectively, and then are hydrolyzed to their respective diols, the so-called DHETs and DiHOMEs. Although EETs and EpOMEs are also substrates for mEH, its role in lipid signaling is considered minor due to lower abundance and activity relative to sEH. Surprisingly, we found that in plasma from mEH KO mice, hydrolysis rates for 8,9-EET and 9,10-EpOME were reduced by 50% compared to WT plasma. This strongly suggests that mEH contributes substantially to the turnover of these FA epoxides-despite kinetic parameters being in favor of sEH. Given the crucial role of liver in controlling plasma diol levels, we next studied the capacity of sEH and mEH KO liver microsomes to synthesize DHETs with varying concentrations of AA (1-30 muM) and NADPH. mEH-generated DHET levels were similar to the ones generated by sEH, when AA concentrations were low (1 muM) or epoxygenase activity was curbed by modulating NADPH. With increasing AA concentrations sEH became more dominant and with 30 muM AA produced twice the level of DHETs compared to mEH. Immunohistochemistry of C57BL/6 liver slices further revealed that mEH expression was more widespread than sEH expression. mEH immunoreactivity was detected in hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, endothelial cells, and bile duct epithelial cells, while sEH immunoreactivity was confined to hepatocytes and bile duct epithelial cells. Finally, transcriptome analysis of WT, mEH KO, and sEH KO liver was carried out to discern transcriptional changes associated with the loss of EH genes along the CYP-epoxygenase-EH axis. We found several prominent dysregulations occurring in a parallel manner in both KO livers: (a) gene expression of Ephx1 (encoding for mEH protein) was increased 1.35-fold in sEH KO, while expression of Ephx2 (encoding for sEH protein) was increased 1.4-fold in mEH KO liver; (b) Cyp2c genes, encoding for the predominant epoxygenases in mouse liver, were mostly dysregulated in the same manner in both sEH and mEH KO mice, showing that loss of either EH has a similar impact. Taken together, mEH appears to play a leading role in the hydrolysis of 8,9-EET and 9,10-EpOME and also contributes to the hydrolysis of other FA epoxides. It probably profits from its high affinity for FA epoxides under non-saturating conditions and its close physical proximity to CYP epoxygenases, and compensates its lower abundance by a more widespread expression, being the only EH present in several sEH-lacking cell types.

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) is involved in the detoxification of xenobiotics that are or can form epoxide metabolites, including the ovotoxicant, 4-vinylcyclohexene (VCH). This industrial chemical is bioactivated by hepatic CYP450 to the diepoxide metabolite, VCD, which destroys mouse small preantral follicles (F1). Since ovarian mEH may play a role in VCD detoxification, these studies investigated the expression and activity of mEH in isolated ovarian fractions. Mice were given 1 or 15 daily doses (ip) of VCH (7.4 mmol/kg/day) or VCD (0.57 mmol/kg/day); 4 h following the final dose, ovaries were removed, distinct populations of intact follicles (F1, 25-100 microm; F2, 100-250 microm; F3, > 250 microm) and interstitial cells (Int) were isolated, and total RNA and protein were extracted. Real-time polymerase chain reaction and the substrate cis-stilbene oxide (CSO; 12.5 microM) were used to evaluate expression and specific activity of mEH, respectively. Confocal microscopy evaluated ovarian distribution of mEH protein. Expression of mRNA encoding mEH was increased in F1 (410 +/- 5% VCH; 292 +/- 5% VCD) and F2 (1379 +/- 4% VCH; 381 +/- 11% VCD) follicles following repeated dosing with VCH or VCD. Catalytic activity of mEH increased in F1 follicles following repeated dosing with VCH/VCD (381 +/- 11% VCH; 384 +/- 27% VCD). Visualized by confocal microscopy, mEH protein was distributed throughout the ovary with the greatest staining intensity in the interstitial cells and staining in the theca cells that was increased by dosing (56 +/- 0.8% VCH; 29 +/- 0.9% VCD). We conclude that mEH is expressed and is functional in mouse ovarian follicles. Additionally,in vivo dosing with VCH and VCD affects these parameters.

The RIKEN Mouse Gene Encyclopaedia Project, a systematic approach to determining the full coding potential of the mouse genome, involves collection and sequencing of full-length complementary DNAs and physical mapping of the corresponding genes to the mouse genome. We organized an international functional annotation meeting (FANTOM) to annotate the first 21,076 cDNAs to be analysed in this project. Here we describe the first RIKEN clone collection, which is one of the largest described for any organism. Analysis of these cDNAs extends known gene families and identifies new ones.

Heat lability of the mouse hepatic microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 enzyme-specific activity (EC 3.3.2.3) is greater for the A/J than the C57BL/6J strain. Analysis of the microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 cDNA coding sequences shows the C57BL/6J and A/J strains to differ in a single base, a C to T transition at position 1012 from the ATG. This change would predict a substitution of an Arg for a Cys at codon 338. Lyman et al. (J. Biol. Chem 255:8650, 1980) studied 26 inbred mouse strains and assigned each strain to one of two groups based upon functional criteria that included heat lability and pH optima for microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1. The heat-labile strains including A/J were denoted with the Ephx1(d) allele, whereas C57BL/6J and other members of the heat-stable strains were denoted with the Ephx1(b) allele. We examined those same inbred mouse strains and found complete concordance between the assignment of microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 allele superscript "b" or "d" and the wild-type and C1012T polymorphism respectively (Fisher's Exact Test, two-sided p < 0.0001). These data suggest that mouse hepatic microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 heat lability is associated with the presence of a Cys at residue 338. Genomic samples from the available AXB and BXA recombinant inbred strains were allelotyped for the SNP identified in the Ephx1 gene that distinguishes the A/J and C57BL/6J parental strains and used to map Ephx1 to Chromosome (Chr) 1 at approximately 98.5cM (LOD = 10.0).