(Below N is a link to NCBI taxonomic web page and E link to ESTHER at designed phylum.) > cellular organisms: NE > Bacteria: NE > Proteobacteria: NE > Gammaproteobacteria: NE > Vibrionales: NE > Vibrionaceae: NE > Vibrio: NE > Vibrio cholerae: NE
Warning: This entry is a compilation of different species or line or strain with more than 90% amino acide identity. You can retrieve all strain data
(Below N is a link to NCBI taxonomic web page and E link to ESTHER at designed phylum.) Vibrio cholerae O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae 1587: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae AM-19226: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae 12129(1): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae RC385: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae M66-2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O395: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae MZO-2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae MZO-3: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae 623-39: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae V51: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae MAK 757: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae B33: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae MO10: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae NCTC 8457: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae TM 11079-80: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae RC9: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae TMA 21: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae BX 330286: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae MJ-1236: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CIRS101: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae RC27: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CT 5369-93: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae 2740-80: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae V52: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-33A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-22A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-43A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. 2010EL-1786: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HFU-02: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-28A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-19A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-70A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-38A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae IEC224: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-02A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE48: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-49A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-06A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HCUF01: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-32A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-48A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-40A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-21A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-23A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae LMA3984-4: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-48B2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-09: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae BJG-01: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae INDRE 91/1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-61A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1044(17): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-71A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. NHCC-008D: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-59A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. NHCC-006C: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-62B1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EDC-022: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-50A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-46: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EC-0027: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-55C2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-77A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-1A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-78A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-02C1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. NHCC-004A: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-41A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1038(11): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1041(14): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EM-1626: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. PCS-022: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-43B1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EDC-020: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-55A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-59B1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. Nep-21113: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EM-1546: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-16: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-67A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EM-1676A: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1033(6): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. PCS-023: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-72A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. Inaba G4222: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-64A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-69A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EC-0051: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae PS15: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-7A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-47A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-20A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-45: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-55B2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-80A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. 95412: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-61A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1037(10): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. 87395: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-51A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EM-1727: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EC-0012: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1042(15): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-25: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-60A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-68A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-57A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-81A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1035(8): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1047(20): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1050(23): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-56A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-39A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-56A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1032(5): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1048(21): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1040(13): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-44C1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-37A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-65A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-50A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-17A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. AG-8040: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-41B1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. 116063: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. NHCC-010F: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-46A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EM-1536: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae 4260B: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-81A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-17A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-46B1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-42A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-62A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-57A2: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. 116059: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. EC-0009: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. Nep-21106: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1046(19): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE-40: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-52A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae O1 str. AG-7404: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HE39: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae CP1030(3): N, E.
Vibrio cholerae HC-36A1: N, E.
Vibrio cholerae bv. albensis VL426: N, E.
Vibrio albensis VL426: N, E.
Molecular evidence
Database
No mutation 1 structure: 1R3D: Structural Genomics target NYSGRC-T920 related to A/B hydrolase fold No kinetic
LegendThis sequence has been compared to family alignement (MSA) red => minority aminoacid blue => majority aminoacid color intensity => conservation rate title => sequence position(MSA position)aminoacid rate Catalytic site Catalytic site in the MSA MLSNQLHFAKPTARTPLVVLVHGLLGSGADWQPVLSHLARTQCAALTLDL PGHGTNPERHCDNFAEAVEMIEQTVQAHVTSEVPVILVGYSLGGRLIMHG LAQGAFSRLNLRGAIIEGGHFGLQENEEKAARWQHDQQWAQRFSQQPIEH VLSDWYQQAVFSSLNHEQRQTLIAQRSANLGSSVAHMLLATSLAKQPYLL PALQALKLPIHYVCGEQDSKFQQLAESSGLSYSQVAQAGHNVHHEQPQAF AKIVQAMIHSIID
Monoacylglycerol lipases (MGL) are a subclass of lipases that predominantly hydrolyze monoacylglycerol (MG) into glycerol and fatty acid. MGLs are ubiquitous enzymes across species and play a role in lipid metabolism, affecting energy homeostasis and signaling processes. Structurally, MGLs belong to the alpha/beta hydrolase fold family with a cap covering the substrate binding pocket. Analysis of the known 3D structures of human, yeast and bacterial MGLs revealed striking similarity of the cap architecture. Since MGLs from different organisms share very low sequence similarity, it is difficult to identify MGLs based on the amino acid sequence alone. Here, we investigated whether the cap architecture could be a characteristic feature of this subclass of lipases with activity towards MG and whether it is possible to identify MGLs based on the cap shape. Through database searches, we identified the structures of five different candidate alpha/beta hydrolase fold proteins with unknown or reported esterase activity. These proteins exhibit cap architecture similarities to known human, yeast and bacterial MGL structures. Out of these candidates we confirmed MGL activity for the protein LipS, which displayed the highest structural similarity to known MGLs. Two further enzymes, Avi_0199 and VC1974, displayed low level MGL activities. These findings corroborate our hypothesis that this conserved cap architecture can be used as criterion to identify lipases with activity towards MGs.
Cholera, caused by Vibrio cholerae, erupted globally from South Asia in 7 pandemics, but there were also local outbreaks between the 6(th) (1899-1923) and 7(th) (1961-present) pandemics. All the above are serotype O1, whereas environmental or invertebrate isolates are antigenically diverse. The pre 7th pandemic isolates mentioned above, and other minor pathogenic clones, are related to the 7(th) pandemic clone, while the 6(th) pandemic clone is in the same lineage but more distantly related, and non-pathogenic isolates show no clonal structure. To understand the origins and relationships of the pandemic clones, we sequenced the genomes of a 1937 prepandemic strain and a 6(th) pandemic isolate, and compared them with the published 7(th) pandemic genome. We distinguished mutational and recombinational events, and allocated these and other events, to specific branches in the evolutionary tree. There were more mutational than recombinational events, but more genes, and 44 times more base pairs, changed by recombination. We used the mutational single-nucleotide polymorphisms and known isolation dates of the prepandemic and 7(th) pandemic isolates to estimate the mutation rate, and found it to be 100 fold higher than usually assumed. We then used this to estimate the divergence date of the 6(th) and 7(th) pandemic clones to be about 1880. While there is a large margin of error, this is far more realistic than the 10,000-50,000 years ago estimated using the usual assumptions. We conclude that the 2 pandemic clones gained pandemic potential independently, and overall there were 29 insertions or deletions of one or more genes. There were also substantial changes in the major integron, attributed to gain of individual cassettes including copying from within, or loss of blocks of cassettes. The approaches used open up new avenues for analysing the origin and history of other important pathogens.
Here we determine the complete genomic sequence of the gram negative, gamma-Proteobacterium Vibrio cholerae El Tor N16961 to be 4,033,460 base pairs (bp). The genome consists of two circular chromosomes of 2,961,146 bp and 1,072,314 bp that together encode 3,885 open reading frames. The vast majority of recognizable genes for essential cell functions (such as DNA replication, transcription, translation and cell-wall biosynthesis) and pathogenicity (for example, toxins, surface antigens and adhesins) are located on the large chromosome. In contrast, the small chromosome contains a larger fraction (59%) of hypothetical genes compared with the large chromosome (42%), and also contains many more genes that appear to have origins other than the gamma-Proteobacteria. The small chromosome also carries a gene capture system (the integron island) and host 'addiction' genes that are typically found on plasmids; thus, the small chromosome may have originally been a megaplasmid that was captured by an ancestral Vibrio species. The V. cholerae genomic sequence provides a starting point for understanding how a free-living, environmental organism emerged to become a significant human bacterial pathogen.
Monoacylglycerol lipases (MGL) are a subclass of lipases that predominantly hydrolyze monoacylglycerol (MG) into glycerol and fatty acid. MGLs are ubiquitous enzymes across species and play a role in lipid metabolism, affecting energy homeostasis and signaling processes. Structurally, MGLs belong to the alpha/beta hydrolase fold family with a cap covering the substrate binding pocket. Analysis of the known 3D structures of human, yeast and bacterial MGLs revealed striking similarity of the cap architecture. Since MGLs from different organisms share very low sequence similarity, it is difficult to identify MGLs based on the amino acid sequence alone. Here, we investigated whether the cap architecture could be a characteristic feature of this subclass of lipases with activity towards MG and whether it is possible to identify MGLs based on the cap shape. Through database searches, we identified the structures of five different candidate alpha/beta hydrolase fold proteins with unknown or reported esterase activity. These proteins exhibit cap architecture similarities to known human, yeast and bacterial MGL structures. Out of these candidates we confirmed MGL activity for the protein LipS, which displayed the highest structural similarity to known MGLs. Two further enzymes, Avi_0199 and VC1974, displayed low level MGL activities. These findings corroborate our hypothesis that this conserved cap architecture can be used as criterion to identify lipases with activity towards MGs.
The 7th cholera pandemic reached Latin America in 1991, spreading from Peru to virtually all Latin American countries. During the late epidemic period, a strain that failed to ferment sucrose dominated cholera outbreaks in the Northern Brazilian Amazon region. In order to understand the genomic characteristics and the determinants of this altered sucrose fermenting phenotype, the genome of the strain IEC224 was sequenced. This paper reports a broad genomic study of this strain, showing its correlation with the major epidemic lineage. The potentially mobile genomic regions are shown to possess GC content deviation, and harbor the main V. cholera virulence genes. A novel bioinformatic approach was applied in order to identify the putative functions of hypothetical proteins, and was compared with the automatic annotation by RAST. The genome of a large bacteriophage was found to be integrated to the IEC224's alanine aminopeptidase gene. The presence of this phage is shown to be a common characteristic of the El Tor strains from the Latin American epidemic, as well as its putative ancestor from Angola. The defective sucrose fermenting phenotype is shown to be due to a single nucleotide insertion in the V. cholerae sucrose-specific transportation gene. This frame-shift mutation truncated a membrane protein, altering its structural pore-like conformation. Further, the identification of a common bacteriophage reinforces both the monophyletic and African-Origin hypotheses for the main causative agent of the 1991 Latin America cholera epidemics.
We report the genome sequence of Vibrio cholerae strain IEC224, which fails to ferment sucrose. It was isolated from a cholera outbreak in the Amazon. The defective sucrose phenotype was determined to be due to a frameshift mutation, and a molecular marker of the Latin American main epidemic lineage was identified.
Cholera was absent from the island of Hispaniola at least a century before an outbreak that began in Haiti in the fall of 2010. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of clinical isolates from the Haiti outbreak and recent global travelers returning to the United States showed indistinguishable PFGE fingerprints. To better explore the genetic ancestry of the Haiti outbreak strain, we acquired 23 whole-genome Vibrio cholerae sequences: 9 isolates obtained in Haiti or the Dominican Republic, 12 PFGE pattern-matched isolates linked to Asia or Africa, and 2 nonmatched outliers from the Western Hemisphere. Phylogenies for whole-genome sequences and core genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms showed that the Haiti outbreak strain is genetically related to strains originating in India and Cameroon. However, because no identical genetic match was found among sequenced contemporary isolates, a definitive genetic origin for the outbreak in Haiti remains speculative.
Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of cholera, is a bacterium autochthonous to the aquatic environment, and a serious public health threat. V. cholerae serogroup O1 is responsible for the previous two cholera pandemics, in which classical and El Tor biotypes were dominant in the sixth and the current seventh pandemics, respectively. Cholera researchers continually face newly emerging and reemerging pathogenic clones carrying diverse combinations of phenotypic and genotypic properties, which significantly hampered control of the disease. To elucidate evolutionary mechanisms governing genetic diversity of pandemic V. cholerae, we compared the genome sequences of 23 V. cholerae strains isolated from a variety of sources over the past 98 years. The genome-based phylogeny revealed 12 distinct V. cholerae lineages, of which one comprises both O1 classical and El Tor biotypes. All seventh pandemic clones share nearly identical gene content. Using analogy to influenza virology, we define the transition from sixth to seventh pandemic strains as a "shift" between pathogenic clones belonging to the same O1 serogroup, but from significantly different phyletic lineages. In contrast, transition among clones during the present pandemic period is characterized as a "drift" between clones, differentiated mainly by varying composition of laterally transferred genomic islands, resulting in emergence of variants, exemplified by V. cholerae O139 and V. cholerae O1 El Tor hybrid clones. Based on the comparative genomics it is concluded that V. cholerae undergoes extensive genetic recombination via lateral gene transfer, and, therefore, genome assortment, not serogroup, should be used to define pathogenic V. cholerae clones.
Cholera, caused by Vibrio cholerae, erupted globally from South Asia in 7 pandemics, but there were also local outbreaks between the 6(th) (1899-1923) and 7(th) (1961-present) pandemics. All the above are serotype O1, whereas environmental or invertebrate isolates are antigenically diverse. The pre 7th pandemic isolates mentioned above, and other minor pathogenic clones, are related to the 7(th) pandemic clone, while the 6(th) pandemic clone is in the same lineage but more distantly related, and non-pathogenic isolates show no clonal structure. To understand the origins and relationships of the pandemic clones, we sequenced the genomes of a 1937 prepandemic strain and a 6(th) pandemic isolate, and compared them with the published 7(th) pandemic genome. We distinguished mutational and recombinational events, and allocated these and other events, to specific branches in the evolutionary tree. There were more mutational than recombinational events, but more genes, and 44 times more base pairs, changed by recombination. We used the mutational single-nucleotide polymorphisms and known isolation dates of the prepandemic and 7(th) pandemic isolates to estimate the mutation rate, and found it to be 100 fold higher than usually assumed. We then used this to estimate the divergence date of the 6(th) and 7(th) pandemic clones to be about 1880. While there is a large margin of error, this is far more realistic than the 10,000-50,000 years ago estimated using the usual assumptions. We conclude that the 2 pandemic clones gained pandemic potential independently, and overall there were 29 insertions or deletions of one or more genes. There were also substantial changes in the major integron, attributed to gain of individual cassettes including copying from within, or loss of blocks of cassettes. The approaches used open up new avenues for analysing the origin and history of other important pathogens.
Here we determine the complete genomic sequence of the gram negative, gamma-Proteobacterium Vibrio cholerae El Tor N16961 to be 4,033,460 base pairs (bp). The genome consists of two circular chromosomes of 2,961,146 bp and 1,072,314 bp that together encode 3,885 open reading frames. The vast majority of recognizable genes for essential cell functions (such as DNA replication, transcription, translation and cell-wall biosynthesis) and pathogenicity (for example, toxins, surface antigens and adhesins) are located on the large chromosome. In contrast, the small chromosome contains a larger fraction (59%) of hypothetical genes compared with the large chromosome (42%), and also contains many more genes that appear to have origins other than the gamma-Proteobacteria. The small chromosome also carries a gene capture system (the integron island) and host 'addiction' genes that are typically found on plasmids; thus, the small chromosome may have originally been a megaplasmid that was captured by an ancestral Vibrio species. The V. cholerae genomic sequence provides a starting point for understanding how a free-living, environmental organism emerged to become a significant human bacterial pathogen.